Memory-Based Learning for LLMs: In recent years, large language model (LLM) agents have been popping up everywhere—from helping with customer service to drafting emails and even writing code. These tools are impressive, no doubt about it. But if you’ve worked with them closely, you’ve probably noticed something: they’re not great at keeping up.
Most LLMs, once trained, don’t really learn anymore. Sure, they can answer thousands of questions and generate endless text, but the knowledge they’re using is locked in time. Updating them with new information usually involves a complex process called fine-tuning, which isn’t just slow—it can also be expensive and risky.
Most LLMs, once trained, don’t really learn anymore. Sure, they can answer thousands of questions and generate endless text, but the knowledge they’re using is locked in time. Updating them with new information usually involves a complex process called fine-tuning, which isn’t just slow—it can also be expensive and risky.
The Problem with Fine-Tuning (And Why It’s Not Always Practical)
Let’s say a company updates its refund policy. To get the new info into their chatbot, they’d typically need to retrain it or fine-tune it with examples. That could take hours—or even days. And on top of that, there’s always a chance it might mess up something else in the model by accident. This is known in the machine learning world as catastrophic forgetting.
Even worse, small changes might require running the whole update cycle again. For rapidly changing environments, that just doesn’t scale. So, we’ve got these “smart” models that can’t remember what just happened last week. This is why researchers have been exploring fine-tuning alternatives such as retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), non-parametric memory approaches, and frameworks like Memento.
Memory-Based Learning for LLMs: A Different Way to Teach AI
Instead of retraining the model, memory-based learning introduces an external structured memory system—something like a scratchpad or notebook that the model can refer to when it needs to.
Here’s how it differs from traditional approaches: memory-based learning for LLMs:
- The model doesn’t change its internal weights (parametric memory).
- Instead of being “re-taught,” it just remembers things it’s seen (non-parametric memory).
- New knowledge is saved outside the model and retrieved when needed, similar to case-based reasoning (CBR).
- The whole process is more flexible and a lot less expensive.
You can think of it like this: instead of rewriting the brain, you’re just giving it access to a journal it can read when needed.
What Exactly Is the Memento Framework?
Memento is a memory-augmented MDP (M-MDP) framework designed to let LLM agents keep learning—even after they’ve been deployed.
At a high level, it’s made up of a few key parts:
1. Memory Store
This is where memories live. Think of it like a searchable archive or notes database. It can include:
- Past conversations
- Corrections from users
- Updated documents
- Event logs
- Feedback (“Hey, that wasn’t right.”)
Everything is stored as text chunks or embedded vectors, depending on how the model context protocol (MCP) or retrieval layer is built.
2. Retriever
When a new question comes in, the system doesn’t just send it to the memory-based learning for LLMs right away. Instead, the retriever scans the memory and pulls out stuff that might help answer the query. If the model is asked, “What’s our latest return policy?” The retriever might find a doc added last Tuesday and use that to inform the response.
3. Context Composer
The relevant bits from memory are then added to the prompt that goes to the model. The model still works the same way—it just sees a little more helpful context when generating a reply.
4. LLM Response
Finally, the Memory-Based Learning for LLMs reads the full prompt (including the memory) and generates a response like normal. No need to fine-tune anything. So really, the model stays frozen, and all the agent adaptability and learning happens around it. Memory-Based Learning for LLMs
How It All Comes Together (Without Touching the Model)
Learning from Experience
- After a conversation, the system picks out useful knowledge.
- This might be a corrected answer, a new document upload, or user feedback.
- That info is saved into memory, usually as embeddings.
Handling New Questions
- Next time a similar question comes up, the system searches memory for anything useful.
- Those pieces are retrieved and stitched into the context prompt.
Answering More Intelligently
- everything it needs—the original question and relevant memory.
- And boom, a smarter, more relevant answer is generated
No Retraining Required
- The model’s weights aren’t touched.
- No GPUs needed. No deployment downtime.
- It’s sort of like giving the model a cheat sheet—but in a good way.
Why This Approach Works So Well
There are a bunch of reasons why people are excited about continual learning and scalable AI agents using memory-based methods:
- Speed: No long fine-tuning cycles. Updates are instant.
- Cost: Way cheaper than training massive models repeatedly (cost-effective AI training).
- Stability: The core model doesn’t forget old stuff.
- Transparency: You can see exactly what was remembered (and edit it). Memory-Based Learning for LLMs
| Feature | Fine-Tuning | Memento (Memory-Based) |
| Update Speed | Slow (hours/days) | Instant |
| Cost | High | Low |
| Risk of Forgetting | High | Very low |
| Explainability | Hard to trace | Easy to trace |
| Reversibility | Difficult | Simple (just delete memory) |
Where It Really Shines (Use Cases)
Personalized AI Assistants If your AI helper remembers your name, what you like, and your past questions, it starts feeling a lot more… helpful. With memory, this kind of personalization becomes easy and safe.
Customer support bots can adapt to product updates or policy changes just by adding new docs to their memory. No model retraining required—ideal for enterprise LLM solutions. Memory-Based Learning for LLMs
How Do We Know It Works?
There are a few ways to evaluate memory-based learning systems:
- Accuracy: Are the answers more relevant after memory is added (factual accuracy in LLMs)?
- Speed: Does retrieval slow things down too much?
- User Feedback: Are people noticing improvements?
- Adaptability: Does the system learn from experience (active exploration in AI)?
In most benchmarks so far—including the DeepResearcher benchmark, the GAIA benchmark, the SimpleQA benchmark, and even Humanity’s Last Exam (HLE)—systems using memory (like Memento) perform just as well—or better—than fine-tuned ones. And they do it with less risk and lower cost. Memory-Based Learning for LLMs
What’s Coming Next?
- Smarter Memory Selection: Using learned attention to choose what matters.
- Shared Memory Across Agents: Like federated memory pools for autonomous AI workers.
- User-Controlled Memory: Letting users edit their assistant’s memory directly.
- Hybrid Approaches: Combining lightweight fine-tuning with memory and reinforcement learning on top of the Markov decision process (MDP) framework.
Conclusion
The idea of giving language models memory might seem obvious in hindsight. Humans learn by remembering. Why shouldn’t AIs?
The Memento framework shows us that LLM agents don’t need to be static. They can evolve and adapt over time—without the heavy lifting of fine-tuning. And that opens up a whole new world of enterprise LLM solutions, scalable AI agents, and adaptive AI systems.
Sure, it’s not perfect. But it’s a promising step toward building generalist LLM agents that don’t just know things—they remember them.
Our Viral Blogs
- Best Online Computer Science Degree in USA
- The Meta-Skills to Future-Proof Your Career 2025
- Google’s $1B AI Training Push: Transforming U.S. Universities in 2025
- Google Gemini for Education: Serving 10 Million Students Across 1,000+ U.S. Colleges
- 5 High-Demand Skills 2025 in the USA
GET IN TOUCH